Which entity is listed alongside ADCON and OPCON in the command relationship context?

Which entity is listed alongside ADCON and OPCON in the command relationship context?

• A. JHQ-C
• B. JRSS
• C. US Cyber Command
• D. National Security Council

Answer: (A)

ADCON and OPCON describe two ways authority is exercised over forces—the administrative control for support and administration, and the operational control for directing how forces are used in missions. In the cyber operations context, a dedicated joint command structure is also recognized: Joint Headquarters-Cyber (JHQ-C). This entity acts as the central command authority for cyber operations at the joint level, coordinating planning and execution across services. That’s why JHQ-C appears alongside ADCON and OPCON in this context—it represents the cyber-specific command authority within the same framework of command relationships. The other options don’t fit because JRSS is a defensive network architecture, US Cyber Command is the overarching combatant command, and the National Security Council is a policy body, not a command relationship term.

ADCON and OPCON describe two ways authority is exercised over forces—the administrative control for support and administration, and the operational control for directing how forces are used in missions. In the cyber operations context, a dedicated joint command structure is also recognized: Joint Headquarters-Cyber (JHQ-C). This entity acts as the central command authority for cyber operations at the joint level, coordinating planning and execution across services. That’s why JHQ-C appears alongside ADCON and OPCON in this context—it represents the cyber-specific command authority within the same framework of command relationships. The other options don’t fit because JRSS is a defensive network architecture, US Cyber Command is the overarching combatant command, and the National Security Council is a policy body, not a command relationship term.